=== February 3, 2008
The Indonesian nation has experienced many events in proving their identity as an independent nation. Various forms of resistance have been initiated, both physical, organizational movement to form a basis state ideology, Pancasila. In the midst of controversy over whether the Pancasila is an ideology or as part of science (philosophy of science); Pancasila became a fundamental reference for the existence of the nation Indonesia.Bahkan some Muslims believe that Pancasila is the objectification of Islamic values.
However, whether the Pancasila can be used as guidelines to become a great nation and dignity in the eyes of the world or even bring more people away from the lofty ideals of the nation when it was still fighting for the independence struggle and seterusnya.Bagi Bung Karno, not just the formulation of Pancasila philosophy of the originator of the intelligence , but more than that is weltschuung Indonesian nation. It was the result of extracting the fundamental traditions and characteristics of a nation.
Therefore, the Bung Karno sure, Pancasila is philosofische groundslag appropriate for the state of RI and can be guiding principles for the Indonesian people in achieving their goals. But in course of time, especially during the reign of Suharto, Pancasila folded in such a way for the sake of self and continuity of power. Ideological contradictions between the Pancasila by Bung Karno and the implementation of Pancasila by the Soeharto regime, as reflected in the lawsuit who masterminded Frankfurt school of Adorno and Habermas, who revealed that a nation must pass through the stage of rational critical when building ideology.
The current condition of Indonesian nationalism was weak, weak HR (human resources); lunturnya discipline; Pancasila teralineasi or alienated; democracy tends to be a destination; ambiguity or ambiguity in the economic arrangements that deviate from national interests, morals and culture of a nation that was ill; defense posture, strength of concern; blasphemy against the TNI as part of the New Order, etc..
A sad fact that when there are bombings and separatist movements in this country. Pancasila as the state philosophy was not able to become an answer to problems that needed resolution. Pancasila was no longer in an eagle's chest is fine, but a weak dove.
Alienation in the Body of Pancasila and the Nation State
Pancasila is currently in a position of considerable discussion was not interested, either by the media and students from elementary to college. By contrast, when the new order era still in power. How people really feel what the meaning is no longer philosophy, Pancasila, but as an ideology-country. Even organizations to political parties are required to base the Pancasila as the basis for the institution.
Pancasila is now part of "history complements" the presence of the Indonesian nation, nothing more. Leagi society and the state did not try to raise the state Pancasila as a cornerstone in solving the problems of the nation. They were busy on contemporary issues and try to find answers to problems but do not look for basic problems.
It is unfortunate when Pancasila the root of the founding nation of Indonesia only be a decoration in a book and a formal legal education in the curriculum. Presumably true that history always carved and interpreted by the winner. History does not belong to the losers. And since the reform era, Pancasila became a part of their history of losing. Speaking of Pancasila as if speaking the new order of tyranny that led this nation in a prolonged downturn. All the problems this nation is initiated by the Pancasila sekan implemented and instilled through P4 and the new order-style education curriculum. Speaking of Pancasila became increasingly taboo in post-reform era.
Therefore, the Indonesian nation must have the courage to do reideologisasi against Pancasila. That is, if the New Order regime has been to degrade the fundamental values of Pancasila through the "idealization" as well as treat it as a "political religion", would now be positioned back on the Five Principles should function as an ideological glue of the nation. Become a modus vivendi for ideological diversity "primordialism" society and the plurality of systems of thought children of the nation.
Second, if this era are abstracted as a era of science and technology, which means a substantive and expansive science and technology is capable of changing human lifestyle, it is in line with the development of the society he will experience the process of cultural transformation from traditional to modern. From myth to logos, from national to trannasional, then to the global mondial. At a certain point, the Indonesian people can be swayed, even a loss of identity, if they have no life guidelines state.
Accordingly, the needs of Pancasila as an ideology that has been actualized themselves in a way to integrate the basic norms, scientific theories and objective facts (Kuntowibisono, 1993), allowing the progress the process of interpretation and reintepretasi critically and honestly. The final level will make the ideology of Pancasila as a dynamic, accommodating, and adaptable to any tendency of the times.
Third, the wave of optimism masyaraka transformation of traditional to modern society, it still leaves a "bomb-bomb" during the unrest that exploded and off-time. Indeed, the phenomenon of modernity promises easiness of living, terninabobokkan ratio, and the hunt for materials and hedonism are allowed.
Defense and State Security
It is not easy to build the Pancasila-based insight about the system of national defense and security in Indonesia now, because of various factors both internal and external force and affect up national defense and security. It can be observed first, from the conceptual side, a lot of factors to consider, where rose factors can not be ascertained accurately. Secondly, from the legal side of the constitutional, whether the whole umbrella of legislation we have a complete or sufficient to provide an umbrella legal authority, to understand and provide a clear linkage between executive functions to provide accountability for its implementation? The third side is the factual situation faced by the Indonesian nation in the midst of national crisis and the reform era, which we need to conduct an evaluation of the concept of national defense and security.
But any insight from it we wake up and we formulated, can not but keep the view point of departure must be based defense and security that the function is one function of government. Defense and security of all countries and their efforts all the efforts of other government functions finally organized to serve the national interest.
From here we can see that the Five Principles need to be strengthened with the instruments of legislative rules that clarify the functions and duties of officers and contains the rules of law. In order patterns and strategies of defense and security remain in the corridors of the unitary Republic of Indonesia. In addition it is also important to hold the instrument in the form of police and armed forces sebegai driving defense and security.
Legislative instruments and apparatus instrument must refer to the foundation ideology of Pancasila. How legislative instruments and apparatus to practice the precepts second instrument, a just and civilized humanity; in discharging duties. Not doing the actions and to keep the stupid actions that could threaten social stability-defense masyarakat.Serta how Pancasila is able to guarantee the Humanitarian Rights related though someone had made a mistake. Make it a platform that is able to touch the entire line of life and a source of reference to all policies of the Unitary Republic of Indonesia country.
REFERENCES
Poerwowidagdo, Sapto J. New paradigm of Indonesian military. Papers presented in the one day seminar Civil-Military Relations Entering the New Millennium; Concerns and Expectations, PGI, February 26, 2000. http://www.hangtuah.ac.id/ Sapto / paradigma.htm
Ariyanto, Totok. Pancasila and Ketercabikan United Nations. Suara Merdeka. Thursday, August 16, 2001.
http://warta.dephan.go.id
Wahyudi, Agus. http://filsafat.ugm.ac.id/aw/. download 2 April 2006
The Indonesian nation has experienced many events in proving their identity as an independent nation. Various forms of resistance have been initiated, both physical, organizational movement to form a basis state ideology, Pancasila. In the midst of controversy over whether the Pancasila is an ideology or as part of science (philosophy of science); Pancasila became a fundamental reference for the existence of the nation Indonesia.Bahkan some Muslims believe that Pancasila is the objectification of Islamic values.
However, whether the Pancasila can be used as guidelines to become a great nation and dignity in the eyes of the world or even bring more people away from the lofty ideals of the nation when it was still fighting for the independence struggle and seterusnya.Bagi Bung Karno, not just the formulation of Pancasila philosophy of the originator of the intelligence , but more than that is weltschuung Indonesian nation. It was the result of extracting the fundamental traditions and characteristics of a nation.
Therefore, the Bung Karno sure, Pancasila is philosofische groundslag appropriate for the state of RI and can be guiding principles for the Indonesian people in achieving their goals. But in course of time, especially during the reign of Suharto, Pancasila folded in such a way for the sake of self and continuity of power. Ideological contradictions between the Pancasila by Bung Karno and the implementation of Pancasila by the Soeharto regime, as reflected in the lawsuit who masterminded Frankfurt school of Adorno and Habermas, who revealed that a nation must pass through the stage of rational critical when building ideology.
The current condition of Indonesian nationalism was weak, weak HR (human resources); lunturnya discipline; Pancasila teralineasi or alienated; democracy tends to be a destination; ambiguity or ambiguity in the economic arrangements that deviate from national interests, morals and culture of a nation that was ill; defense posture, strength of concern; blasphemy against the TNI as part of the New Order, etc..
A sad fact that when there are bombings and separatist movements in this country. Pancasila as the state philosophy was not able to become an answer to problems that needed resolution. Pancasila was no longer in an eagle's chest is fine, but a weak dove.
Alienation in the Body of Pancasila and the Nation State
Pancasila is currently in a position of considerable discussion was not interested, either by the media and students from elementary to college. By contrast, when the new order era still in power. How people really feel what the meaning is no longer philosophy, Pancasila, but as an ideology-country. Even organizations to political parties are required to base the Pancasila as the basis for the institution.
Pancasila is now part of "history complements" the presence of the Indonesian nation, nothing more. Leagi society and the state did not try to raise the state Pancasila as a cornerstone in solving the problems of the nation. They were busy on contemporary issues and try to find answers to problems but do not look for basic problems.
It is unfortunate when Pancasila the root of the founding nation of Indonesia only be a decoration in a book and a formal legal education in the curriculum. Presumably true that history always carved and interpreted by the winner. History does not belong to the losers. And since the reform era, Pancasila became a part of their history of losing. Speaking of Pancasila as if speaking the new order of tyranny that led this nation in a prolonged downturn. All the problems this nation is initiated by the Pancasila sekan implemented and instilled through P4 and the new order-style education curriculum. Speaking of Pancasila became increasingly taboo in post-reform era.
Therefore, the Indonesian nation must have the courage to do reideologisasi against Pancasila. That is, if the New Order regime has been to degrade the fundamental values of Pancasila through the "idealization" as well as treat it as a "political religion", would now be positioned back on the Five Principles should function as an ideological glue of the nation. Become a modus vivendi for ideological diversity "primordialism" society and the plurality of systems of thought children of the nation.
Second, if this era are abstracted as a era of science and technology, which means a substantive and expansive science and technology is capable of changing human lifestyle, it is in line with the development of the society he will experience the process of cultural transformation from traditional to modern. From myth to logos, from national to trannasional, then to the global mondial. At a certain point, the Indonesian people can be swayed, even a loss of identity, if they have no life guidelines state.
Accordingly, the needs of Pancasila as an ideology that has been actualized themselves in a way to integrate the basic norms, scientific theories and objective facts (Kuntowibisono, 1993), allowing the progress the process of interpretation and reintepretasi critically and honestly. The final level will make the ideology of Pancasila as a dynamic, accommodating, and adaptable to any tendency of the times.
Third, the wave of optimism masyaraka transformation of traditional to modern society, it still leaves a "bomb-bomb" during the unrest that exploded and off-time. Indeed, the phenomenon of modernity promises easiness of living, terninabobokkan ratio, and the hunt for materials and hedonism are allowed.
Defense and State Security
It is not easy to build the Pancasila-based insight about the system of national defense and security in Indonesia now, because of various factors both internal and external force and affect up national defense and security. It can be observed first, from the conceptual side, a lot of factors to consider, where rose factors can not be ascertained accurately. Secondly, from the legal side of the constitutional, whether the whole umbrella of legislation we have a complete or sufficient to provide an umbrella legal authority, to understand and provide a clear linkage between executive functions to provide accountability for its implementation? The third side is the factual situation faced by the Indonesian nation in the midst of national crisis and the reform era, which we need to conduct an evaluation of the concept of national defense and security.
But any insight from it we wake up and we formulated, can not but keep the view point of departure must be based defense and security that the function is one function of government. Defense and security of all countries and their efforts all the efforts of other government functions finally organized to serve the national interest.
From here we can see that the Five Principles need to be strengthened with the instruments of legislative rules that clarify the functions and duties of officers and contains the rules of law. In order patterns and strategies of defense and security remain in the corridors of the unitary Republic of Indonesia. In addition it is also important to hold the instrument in the form of police and armed forces sebegai driving defense and security.
Legislative instruments and apparatus instrument must refer to the foundation ideology of Pancasila. How legislative instruments and apparatus to practice the precepts second instrument, a just and civilized humanity; in discharging duties. Not doing the actions and to keep the stupid actions that could threaten social stability-defense masyarakat.Serta how Pancasila is able to guarantee the Humanitarian Rights related though someone had made a mistake. Make it a platform that is able to touch the entire line of life and a source of reference to all policies of the Unitary Republic of Indonesia country.
REFERENCES
Poerwowidagdo, Sapto J. New paradigm of Indonesian military. Papers presented in the one day seminar Civil-Military Relations Entering the New Millennium; Concerns and Expectations, PGI, February 26, 2000. http://www.hangtuah.ac.id/ Sapto / paradigma.htm
Ariyanto, Totok. Pancasila and Ketercabikan United Nations. Suara Merdeka. Thursday, August 16, 2001.
http://warta.dephan.go.id
Wahyudi, Agus. http://filsafat.ugm.ac.id/aw/. download 2 April 2006
0 comments :
Posting Komentar